|
|
“It’s never too late - in fiction or in life - to revise.” This simple quote is a fitting line for smokers who hesitate to quit smoking because they feel it is too late or too hard to quit. Addicts should train their mind to think about quit smoking benefits rather than the short term pains of quitting. According to experts with each cigarette that a smoker burn, they lose money, health, time and respect and that’s exactly what they gain as a non-smoker!
Read on to know more about quit smoking benefits in this article that talks about why to quit smoking and how to get effective quit smoking help to achieve your quitting goal.
Why to Quit Smoking?
Till date, all scientific researches have pointed towards the adverse effects on health and vitality of the smokers. In most countries across the world a mandatory health warning is clearly printed on each pack of cigarette. The message intends to work as a gentle reminder for smokers to quit smoking every time they buy a cigarette box for themselves.
Smoking adversely affects every organ of the body and may cause you several types of cancer, lung diseases, heart ailments and many more painful diseases. Smoking is especially harmful for women. Pregnant ladies who smoke are likely to suffer miscarriage or have a lower birth weight baby.
Even if you have been a chain smoker for years, it is never too late to quit smoking. Experts say that no matter how old you are or how long you’ve smoked, quitting can help you enjoy a higher quality of life with fewer illnesses from cold and flu viruses, better self-reported health, and reduced rates of bronchitis and pneumonia.
Quit Smoking Benefits
Quit smoking benefits are not just limited to improvement in your health and life expectancy but have positive effects on your social life. Listed here are the key quit smoking benefits with a wish that it will encourage smokers to get rid of the addictive habit.
• Quitting smoking means reduced chances of developing cancer, heart ailments and lung diseases.
• It means less coughing, panting and decreased risk of illness.
• Your life expectancy improves which means you can spend more time with your family and children.
• Your general health will improve and you will feel lot better.
• A big stop smoking benefit is you will have high energy levels. You will not feel exhausted on daily basis and hence climbing stairs will be less of a difficulty.
• Smoking adversely affects fertility. When you quit smoking, the fertility rate may get improved.
• If you are a woman and stop smoking, the chances of having fetal malformations are reduced.
• You can get rid of stale tobacco smoke in your hair, clothes and on your skin, which are great stop smoking benefits.
• Whiter teeth, fresher breath and sharper thinking are other wonderful quit smoking benefits.
• You will experience less heartburn and indigestion.
• You will not be living under the guilt of causing slow death to your friends and family due to passive smoking.
• Quitting benefits your pocket too as less money is spent on cigarettes. This means you can pamper yourself with extra treats and luxuries as a direct benefit of stopping smoking.
Quit Smoking Help
Always remember quitting is hard but very much possible. To achieve your quitting goal you may seek help of hundreds of organizations, friends and family members who are more than willing to offer you quit smoking help. Apart from organizations, you may also seek assistance from your doctor, dentist, local hospital or employer who may offer you information, counseling and moral support. Tell your support group in advance about your quit date so that they may offer you quit smoking help when required.
The first quit smoking help you can offer yourself is to throw away all your cigarettes, lighters and ashtrays. Also make persistent and determined efforts to avoid places, people and situations that are likely to tempt you to smoke. For a few days you are likely to suffer from withdrawal symptoms such as anger, depression, splitting headaches besides others. Request your family members, friends and colleagues for tolerance and help you quit smoke.
If you do not wish to go through the difficult process of leaving cold turkey, request your doctor to prescribe quit smoking help drugs like Chantix. Manufactured by Pfizer, Chantix is a non-nicotine medication that fights nicotine cravings and reduces withdrawal symptoms. The ingredient inhibits the nicotine in cigarette smoke from binding to the nicotinic receptors in the brain and helps reduce the effects of dangerous nicotine. The drug therefore removes the pleasure out of smoking so that you don’t feel like lighting another cigarette in your life!
About the Author
The author Katie DHF writes articles on Sports Accessories, Tips on Quit Smoking Aids, Quit Smoking Benefits, Healthcare and she is also doing the Help to quit smoking by using Quit smoking drug. After following her successions, many people released from their smoking addiction.
“Quitting smoking is easy. I’ve done it a thousand times.” This quote by Mark Twain, aptly describes how tough it is for the addicts to stop smoking once and for all. Quitting cold turkey does help many smokers but many succumb to the temptation of having a puff again which gradually leads them back to their habit of chain smoking. In fact it has been observed that some smokers have to make 3 – 10 attempts to quit smoking in their life.
To make quitting attempts convenient and successful there are several quit smoking aids available in the market. Smokers can get help from a doctor or a dentist to decide on the most suitable quit smoking aid for them when they make a committed decision to quit.
Quit Smoking Aids
Smokers are very much aware of the health risk posed by cigarettes on their body and most of them have an unconscious desire to break the habit one day. The biggest fear faced by smokers thinking about quitting are the withdrawal symptoms and whether they will be too much to handle. Withdrawal symptoms like cravings, headache, cough, fatigue, anxiety, anger, insomnia, constipation, weight gain etc can put tremendous pressure on someone who is trying to give it up, and more than often leads to them picking up the habit again. Often, the fear of nicotine withdrawal symptoms dissuade smokers from even making an attempt to quit smoking while those who attempt give in to the symptoms and get back to their old habit.
To help smokers quit successfully with minimum discomfort there are large number of quit smoking aids available today. Listed here are few of the most successful ones –
- Nicotine Replacement Therapy
The nicotine in cigarettes causes an addiction and unpleasant feelings of withdrawal when a person tries to quit. Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) works by providing the body with nicotine generally in the form of a Nicotine Chewing Gum or Nicotine Patch without the other harmful parts of tobacco. Other forms of nicotine based quit smoking aids include nicotine tabs, lozenges, nicotine nasal spray, inhalators. These aids can help a person concentrate more on quitting the habit of smoking by relieving the symptoms of withdrawal.
However, since NRTs contain nicotine, a certain risk of re-addiction is involved when using these products. Therefore, one must use this method carefully by following instructions from doctor.
- Nicotine-Free Quit Smoking Aids
These days there are several forms of quit smoking aids that do not use nicotine as an active ingredient. These are prescription based drugs and hence should be taken under a doctor’s care.
Zyban - The active ingredient in this quit smoking aid is bupropion hydrochloride. Developed as an anti-depressant drug, Zyban has been shown to dramatically reduce physical withdrawal symptoms associated with nicotine and hence works well as a smoking cessation aid.
Chantix – Developed by Pfizer, Chantix (varenicline tartrate) was approved by FDA in May 2006. Unique property of this popular quit smoking aid is that it reduces the level of satisfaction derived from smoking. Chantix also reduces the nicotine withdrawal effects and thus makes it convenient to quit.
Processes to Follow Quit Smoking Aids
Following processes may help smokers quit smoking successfully -
1.Decide to Quit – This is the fundamental aspect of any smoking cessation program. Tell yourself honestly that you want to quit and you will quit.
2.Prepare to Quit – Planning makes it possible. Set a quit date, seek support of your friends and family, and be prepared for the cravings that come with withdrawal.
3.Use Quit Smoking Aids – Quitting cold turkey is tough for people addicted to nicotine. Prescription drugs like Chantix reduce the impact of withdrawal and helps you quit successfully.
Benefits of Quit Smoking Drugs
Studies reveal that quit smoking drugs quadruples a person’s chances to quit smoking as compared to trying it cold turkey. The best part of quit smoking drugs like Chantix is that it makes quitting a painless process as it significantly reduces the effects of nicotine withdrawals. The other good characteristic of Chantix is that is makes smoking less enjoyable for you. People on Chantix do not derive any pleasure out of smoking and are therefore reluctant to light up again. This is a significant feature of Chantix for smokers who are unable to bear the craving and have a tendency to break their smoking cessation program by lighting a cigarette.
Seek your doctor’s approval before using Chantix as a quit smoking aid and get the cigarettes out of your life, forever.
About the Author
The author Katie DHF writes articles on Sports Accessories, Tips on Quit Smoking Aids, Quit Smoking Benefits, Healthcare and she is also doing the Help to quit smoking by using Quit smoking drug. After following her successions, many people released from their smoking addiction.
Few will argue that drug abuse has become one of our nations biggest domestic problems. Drugs and the heartbreak that follows have invaded both urban and rural communities across the country, inflicting devastation wherever they appear. Younger and younger children are experimenting with drugs and now, even elementary school age children have been found abusing marijuana, prescription drugs pilfered from their parent’s medicine cabinets and drugs manufactured from over-the-counter concoctions and hawked to them by older students. Half of all seniors in high school admit to having tried drugs and one out of ten admit to using marijuana regularly. Despite their vigilance, many parents find it impossible to tell if their children are dabbling in this dangerous world of drugs or not. Others are only too aware that drugs have invaded their households. In big, gateway cities like Los Angeles, drugs are a particular problem.
With the emerging effectiveness of Drug Testing in the workplace, in sports and in the military, the government took notice of the significant drop in drug use where random Drug Testing was being applied. In 2001, the U.S. Department of Education funded U.S. High schools with a $1.7 million dollar award to put random Drug Testing in high schools across the country. The result? A study done in 2006 shows there has been a 23% drop in high school students using illicit drugs in those schools that participated in random Drug Testing – that means some 840,000 fewer kids on drugs. That’s encouraging news. And it’s hard to dispute those kinds of numbers when searching for tools to fight drug abuse.
In Los Angeles, Drug Testing has become the weapon-of-choice for many parents who fear for their children’s safety. Some parents come to Drug Testing as a last resort when evidence of drug abuse is obvious and treatment is necessary. Others see it as a front line defense. Drug Testing in Los Angeles may be mandated by the Juvenile Court system, done privately through one of many Drug Testing facilities in Los Angeles, or through home Drug Testing kits. Whatever precipitates this step, it is never easily taken. Parents fear their children will feel they don’t trust them. However, as experts discovered in this sampling of Drug Testing high schools across the country, there is another factor at work here.
Peer pressure, when it comes to using or experimenting with drugs, can be every bit as powerful as it is in other areas of our children’s lives. Many children find it difficult to ‘just say no’ when their friends are doing drugs and asking them to join in, even if they want to say no. Even if you believe your child is not doing drugs, but is going to school in a climate of drug abusers, there may be good reason to incorporate random Drug Testing in your household.
Los Angeles tenth grader, Monica Rivers’ parents had been watching their beautiful daughter go from a straight A, soccer-playing charmer to a child they hardly recognized. Monica began spending more and more time alone in her room. She claimed fatigue when it was time to play soccer and eventually dropped off the team she had loved. Her grades began to slip. Parent-teacher meetings revealed little except that Monica seemed to be going through something. Monica’s symptoms seemed like a cry for help. Her parents feared she would balk at Drug Testing and accuse them of not trusting her–which, in fact, happened. But they went to an accredited Los Angeles Drug Testing company, purchased a Drug Testing kit anyway, because they loved their daughter.
It turned out they were right about the drug abuse. She had, she admitted, been experimenting with marijuana and even tried some prescription drugs her friends brought to school. But to her parents’ surprise, she was immensely relieved to be able to stop the experimentation that she’d felt compelled by peer pressure to do. Monica was able to put the blame on her parents’ random Drug Tests to decline the girls who’d been pressuring her. Luckily for Monica, her parents intervened before her drug use got out of control. Today, Monica is playing soccer again and planning for college.
There are several types of Drug Testing available. Accredited drug-testing facilities in Los Angeles can do the testing for you or you can purchase home Drug Testing kits for in-home use. These tests are easy to use. The samples are either taken or sent by mail to the lab and the results mailed back. Drug Testing consists of urine sample, oral fluid samples, sweat testing and hair testing. Drugs normally detected through any one of these samples, such as marijuana, opiates, cocaine, amphetamines and PCP remain in the body for a longer amount of time, than say, alcohol. In Los Angeles, Drug Testing kits cost between $10 and $30. Ironically, parents often find that confessions come from their children on the way to the Drug Testing lab to deliver results, providing a unique opportunity for honest conversations at last between them.
The purpose of random drug testing by parents is not, as most assume, punitive. In Los Angeles, Drug Testing by parents who are concerned for their children’s welfare is an opportunity for communication if it is approached not as a punishment, or accusation, but as a way for our children to cope with the pressures in the world today.
About the Author
Larry Borsheim is a freelance writer with specialized knowledge in chemistry, DNA Testing and Drug Testing. Contact Larry at dnadrugtest@gmail.com for more information.
Extract from The Cure for Alcoholism (Benbella Books, October, 2008)
Author: Dr Roy Eskapa
Foreword: Dr David Sinclair
Advance Praise:
“The Cure for Alcoholism provides something that ’s never been offered before… the potential of A REAL CURE. This book does not deal with prayer, will power or abstinence. This is the first book and program I’ve seen that genuinely offers to modify an addiction that is neurologically rooted and thought by so many to be incurable. I believe that The Cure for Alcoholism will change the face of this serious addiction and rock the rehab industry. ”
Professor Arnold A. Lazarus, Ph.D.
Arnold A. Lazarus, Ph.D. is a Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Psychology at Rutgers University (having also been a faculty member at Stanford University, Temple University Medical School, and Yale University where he was the Director of Training in Clinical Psychology for two years). He has written 17 books and over 350 professional articles and has been the recipient of numerous honors and awards. He is a Diplomate of the American Board of Professional Psychology and was also awarded Board Certification.
CASE HISTORIES FROM BOOK:
Julia’s Story: Sinclair “Deluxe†Treatment
“The most astonishing thing about miracles is that they happen.â€
—G. K. Chesterton (1874–1936)
ALTHOUGH INTENSIVE PSYCHOTHERAPY is not a requirement for successful treatment, Julia’s story has been included because it provides an insight into both the theory and practice of the Sinclair Method and, at the same time, illustrates how the treatment can be enhanced through close, one-to-one contact with competent, caring professionals.
Julia, a thirty-eight-year-old woman, and her devoted husband, James, have been married for eighteen years. They live in a beautiful lakeside house in the Pacific Northwest together with their two adolescent daughters. A little more than two years ago, Julia lost her ability to control her drinking. Although she could sustain periods of abstinence, she frequently found herself craving alcohol, especially by the end of the week. The family became
accustomed to Julia getting drunk at parties and on Friday and Saturday nights. But when episodes of severe intoxication spilled into the week as well, her features thickened and her delicate, luminous complexion turned rough and pallid. She began taking “hair of the dog†drinks on Monday mornings after everyone had left the house.
A gifted potter, Julia once ran a successful small pottery business from a studio at her home. But her studio was now a mess, and she no longer used it. James, a highly respected lawyer and a passionate conservationist whom everyone thought of as a gentle soul, could not stop himself from quarrelling with her over her drinking. He had always adored her, but their once near-idyllic life had come to resemble a war zone. Horrified to find himself contemplating divorce, he implored her to seek professional help, but she angrily refused.
“I just have to drink,†she told him. “I don’t know why. You can all leave me if you want to; I just can’t stop it.â€
A few days later, James read a newspaper article about the Sinclair Method. He nervously contacted the clinic in Florida that was offering this new treatment. He explained that his wife was terrified because she had heard that addicts were hospitalized, forced to stop drinking and attend group meetings, and go through the torture of detoxification. She had also heard that many people who had gone to rehabilitation were often not only unsuccessful, roller-coasting between abstinence and relapse, but were often left feeling even more desperate after treatment. The trained receptionist explained that the Sinclair Method was different, a completely new approach that did not demand total abstinence, and she sent James an information packet describing the treatment.*
The skillfully worded packet went a long way toward persuading Julia to see a doctor at the clinic. “No one is born an alcoholic,†one brochure in the packet explained. “Drinking is gradually learned. Each time you drink, alcohol causes the release of endorphins or morphine-like substances in the brain.†Endorphins are the body’s “molecules of emotion†and can suppress pain. The
endorphins strengthen or reinforce the drinking and everything that goes along with it—thinking about alcohol, going to the bar, wanting a drink, ordering it, waiting for it, and finally, drinking it. This happens to everyone but some people, because of their genetic make-up, receive more powerful jolts of reinforcement from the endorphins. Over time, alcohol begins to dominate their lives, and they end up out of control—totally addicted to alcohol. But, the brochure explained, the vicious cycle can be broken or weakened through the “natural process of extinction using the medicine naltrexone to block the endorphins and the reinforcement they produce in the brain.â€
The entire family read the information packet. They learned that the treatment did not require hospitalization. This was especially encouraging to Julia, who hated anything to do with hospitals. She read that her goals would be “reduction, control or abstinence†and that she need not abstain before beginning treatment. The treatment would reduce her desire to drink while she continued to drink! The clinic’s brochure explained that the drinking would decrease, not because of external demands or threats, but because the patient would simply lose interest in it. Using an approach that is entirely compatible with that of Alcoholics Anonymous, the Sinclair Method “works well for both people who are severely addicted, and for those who merely drink more than they would like.â€
This seemed too good to be true to Julia, but she was encouraged by the fact that she would not be given strong medications, such as barbiturates or benzodiazepines, which can be addictive. Julia also learned that the World Health Organization and the FDA had already reported that naltrexone was safe and did not produce lasting or serious side effects when it was used together with alcohol. The treatment, which normally takes between three and four months, was not to be undertaken without a doctor’s prescription. Individual therapy was not always required, but could be helpful as part of a comprehensive treatment program. Julia and her family agreed that she should make an appointment at the clinic.
Her first appointment was not what she expected. The staff at the clinic treated Julia with dignity and did not label her as a
“weak-willed alcoholic.†Julia was told that she would be seen by a team consisting of a physician, Dr. Anderson, and a counseling psychologist, Dr. Simon. Having two primary caregivers, she was informed, was not necessary but could be helpful.
At Julia’s first screening session, Dr. Anderson explained how she had become addicted to alcohol. He decided to accept her for treatment, saying, “The Sinclair Method is not for those who are currently abstinent.â€
“You mean to say that if I were in A.A. already for a few months and not drinking at all, I would not be able to have this treatment?†Julia asked, astonished.
“That’s right,†Dr. Anderson smiled, “The treatment is only for those who are currently drinking. It only works if you take the medication an hour before you have your first drink. We do not prescribe this treatment for those who are abstinent.â€
“Well, it’s a good thing I am drinking, isn’t it?â€
“Until I saw Dr. Sinclair’s research data, I never would have thought this possible,†Dr. Anderson replied. “We’ve treated a few hundred cases, and the results are excellent!â€
In addition to the standard psychotherapeutic approach of “inspiring hope,†Dr. Anderson made certain that Julia was not pregnant, did not have a medical condition that would make her unsuitable for treatment, and was not taking other opiates, such as heroin. As a final precautionary measure, Julia was scheduled for lab work to test for any undiagnosed medical problems.
From the start, Julia was impressed by the nonjudgmental approach of her doctor. She felt a faint flutter of hope. “These people really care,†she thought. “They really are trying to help me.†She was also impressed by the visual aids Dr. Anderson showed her, detailing the connections and pathways in her brain that had become strengthened over years of drinking. Julia said later that she felt better knowing that there was “something physically wrong in my brain and nerves and not me as a person. The way my drinking had become worse over the years suddenly made sense to me. After all, I didn’t start out with this craving. I certainly never drank in the mornings, or binged. Before I became addicted, I used to drink quite moderately.â€
Julia took James to her next appointment with Dr. Anderson. He checked the Drinking Diary he had given her at their first meeting and conducted a medical examination. Julia had not been drinking every day since her initial screening visit, but her diary did show bingeing: well over sixty drinks per week, with most of it concentrated over the weekend. “I just can’t stop after the first drink. Why, doctor? Why?†She then saw some biological drawings depicting how addiction had been “burned†into her brain over years of drinking through the mechanism of reinforced learning.
(Please see the images and explanation in Appendix B.)
The biological or “Purple Rain†drawings—as Dr David Sinclair calls them—showed how alcohol causes endorphins to reinforce drinking, so that the nerve pathways become stronger. The next set of drawings showed how taking naltrexone before drinking would ultimately extinguish her addiction. For Julia, these drawings placed things in perspective, and she was relieved and thankful that the cause of her problem was not personal weakness but “brain biology.†Her genetic predisposition for alcoholism and many drinking sessions over the years had combined to make her an alcoholic.
The learning was connected to stimuli. She learned to drink in response to various external or internal stimuli. These stimuli thus gained the ability to make her crave and drink alcohol. One set of stimuli always present with every drink except the first one of the day are the sensations produced by the alcohol already consumed, including the taste, smell, and feel, and the stimulatory effect produced by low doses of alcohol. Julia learned that was why the first drink made it almost impossible to stop. Her drinking was learned, and much of it had been learned as a response to the stimuli produced by the previous drink.
“I was just better than others at learning drinking,†Julia exclaimed.
Dr. Anderson said that the situation could be corrected in a matter of months—without willpower or even trying to stop drinking. “All I had to do to beat this thing was to take one of those white tablets before having a drink,†she thought to herself later on.
To James, it seemed a dangerous contradiction to encourage an alcoholic to carry on drinking—even after taking naltrexone. Emotionally, he still reacted by hating the fact that his wife had become an alcoholic, that alcohol was destroying their lives. Surely Julia should stop drinking immediately? But James finally grasped the theory. He was even more optimistic when he was shown the reduced craving and drinking results compiled from other successful patients.
Dr. Anderson gave Julia her prescription for naltrexone, and he informed her that this was not a “get sober†medication—she should not operate machinery or drive while drinking. Looking at the tablets in her hand, Julia still wondered if they could actually help her. As directed, Julia started out by taking her first dose (25 mg) an hour before taking her first drink. Two days later, an hour before her next drinking session, she took the full (50 mg) dose.
“I didn’t really notice anything much,†she told her psychologist, Dr. Simon, at the next meeting. “Perhaps there was a bit less of a buzz, but I can’t be sure.â€
Dr. Simon was supportive. “There are no right or wrong reactions,†he said.
She handed in her Drinking Diary and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) form, which tracked her craving on a scale from 0 (no craving) to 10 (highest craving). Drinking was slightly down at forty-six drinks for that week and her craving was in the high range— naltrexone was not a “magic pill†and did not work overnight. Julia was still seriously addicted to alcohol.
“The Golden Rule,†her psychologist repeated, “is that you always take the medication an hour before drinking. The fact that you reduced your drinking by a few drinks this week is because, by blocking the effects of endorphins, the naltrexone reduced the stimulatory or first-drink effects of alcohol. Extinction has started, but you still have a way to go. You have just begun treatment. keep going.â€
Julia was thrilled that she had had less to drink because it gave her more than just a flutter of hope. The session involved an explanation of stimuli or triggers that elicit craving and drinking. When asked about her drinking history and the situations that set
off her drinking, Julia explained, “I found that I started as a way to enjoy myself or relax on weekends. I loved it when the kids were small, tucked up in bed, and James and I could be alone. It was so romantic to be in front of the fire with a bottle of red wine. Red wine, that’s my favorite. Drinking seemed to improve our lovemaking and took the inhibitions out of me. And that’s when I started drinking socially, which is interesting because I didn’t drink as a teenager. Now I don’t even need an excuse; I drink out of habit.â€
Julia told Dr. Simon that when she first began drinking, parties were major triggers for getting drunk. James dreaded them. He thought Julia was being selfish when she drank too much. He didn’t know that her brain biology would not allow her to keep her promise not to drink. It was during this session that Julia learned about the specific triggers that caused her to drink. Over several years, she had come to associate drinking with many situations. The therapy would require that Julia drink while on the medication in all the situations in which she normally drank—privately at home, in social situations, through all seasons, in the morning, afternoon, and evening—whenever she was accustomed to drinking. She had to use naltrexone to extinguish her addiction with every drinking situation.
“Just wait till I tell the family about all this,†she told Dr. Simon. “My drinking had become a secretive, private matter. It was like a love affair, taking precedence over the things I most treasured. I am beginning to understand why my drinking was more imp ortant to me than my wonderful family. It was because my brain took over and ran the show.â€
“Once we have your drinking under control or you have reached your goal in a few months, we will still want you to keep your medication with you at all times—just in case your craving returns and you have the urge to drink. But, for the moment, let’s proceed with you taking your medication and drinking. Go home, take your medication, and drink as usual. Remember to keep up with your Drinking Diary. We can discuss options of where and when to drink at your next session. Though before we meet, you will have a short meeting with Dr. Anderson.â€
The next meeting with Dr. Anderson lasted only ten minutes.
Julia was asked if the medication had any side effects, but there were none to report. She handed in her Drinking Diary and her subjective craving level was assessed. The number of drinks per week and her craving levels were still high. She was also given standard research questionnaires. The Beck Depression Inventory evaluated depression. The Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale assessed her thought patterns related to drinking.
Her next counseling session two weeks later with Dr. Simon was designed to help her prepare for the future. Julia’s drinking habits were explored. “Everyone has their unique triggers,†Dr. Simon said. “I see from your diary that your drinking is down a bit, from forty-six to thirty-eight drinks this week. Normal progress.â€
Julia still found that she wanted to drink on her own as well as on social occasions. “I am so grateful that my family understands that I have to drink to be cured,†she said to Dr. Simon. “It was a hard one for my daughters to understand. Now they are even pleased when they see me with a glass in my hand! They know how the medication and treatment works.â€
“Be alert for the festive season, for emotional triggers, for any situation in which you normally would drink,†Dr. Simon reminded her. “And above all, remember our golden rule—never drink without first taking naltrexone!â€
The session ended with Dr. Simon saying that a support group for patients had started and that Julia was welcome to join it. Julia did not feel this was for her.
By the end of the eighth week, Julia’s drinking had dropped to twenty-three drinks per week. This was good progress, but still a bit above the safety limit for women. She told Dr. Anderson what had been happening in her life: “James and I are getting on better already. We actually made love for the first time in ages! I no longer stumble into things. For one thing, my knees are better because I’m not bumping into the glass coffee table. My hangovers have lessened. I am actually enjoying my non-drinking days. Last weekend we all went for a picnic. I had my naltrexone and a bottle of nice California red wine with me. But I didn’t open it. The girls were amazed, and James said I was being strong. The amazing, wonderful thing is that I was not being strong. My urge to drink
simply was not there. I wonder if it really is possible to stop altogether. I can see how it might be.â€
Dr. Anderson noted that Julia still had three instances over the past two weeks where she had consumed more than five drinks in a single drinking session. He explained that she was doing well, but still had much of the neural circuitry that caused craving and drinking in line with her binge-style drinking. “Focus on enjoyable activities on your non-drinking, non-medication days,†Dr. Anderson advised. “Your social drinking has diminished already, but I see that you are still drinking on your own—drinking less, but you still took more than five drinks one after the other on your own.â€
Julia felt positive. She had begun to sense that control over alcohol was within her reach. Her mood improved. She was optimistic and, for the first time in years, had a sense of purpose.
When she arrived home, the first thing she did was to go into her disused pottery studio at the end of her garden. She stood by the lake under a bright blue sky. The air was crisp and blazing fall colors reflected on the water. Julia felt happy and with that feeling came a sudden urge for a drink. Because, although she was happy, she was also sad. Sad that more than six years had gone by without doing much pottery. Sad because of what her drinking had done to her marriage and to her family. She looked at the disused trays, the dusty objects she had so lovingly crafted, painted, and fired. Then she reacted the way she did automatically under stress. She rushed to the kitchen and poured a stiff vodka. She knocked it back neat without having taken her medication.
In a state of panic, she called Dr. Anderson.
“Am I relapsing?†she asked urgently.
“When did you have the drink?â€
“About fifteen minutes ago.â€
“Take your medication as soon as you hang up. It will still have the chance to do some good. Don’t worry, Julia. The worst thing is for you to punish yourself. You will get there in the end.â€
Julia followed his advice and took the medication. She returned to her studio carrying the bottle of vodka and her portable CD player. “What the hell,†she thought. “I may as well. I’ve taken my medi﷓
cation.†She spent the next three hours listening to music while she cleaned the studio and threw out broken pieces of pottery.
Julia was startled when her eldest daughter, Sonia walked in.
“What are you doing here, Mom?†Sonia asked anxiously.
“Oh, nothing much. I thought I would clean the studio. I guess I’d better lock up, and get some dinner ready.†It was then that she noticed the bottle of vodka. She had not touched it—not once since the first drink. The thought of drinking had not entered her mind. Surprised and delighted, she told Sonia about it.
“You are coming back to us, Mom, you are coming back!†Sonia said, “Let’s tell Dad.â€
Julia’s next appointment was with Dr. Simon, who had asked if James would be able to attend part of that session. The idea was to go over the treatment with James because he was so intimately involved with Julia.
“I can’t believe it, Doctor, I am getting my wife back,†James said. “She drinks, but not as much. She doesn’t get crazy. Her moods are better, right, Julia?â€
Julia smiled and said, “I’m sure it’s working. But I still somehow think I need time. I don’t crave as much. I’m not fixated on getting my next drink.â€
After four months, the Drinking Diary showed that Julia was drinking within safe limits—less than eighteen drinks per week and no more than four on any single occasion. Dr. Simon was cautiously optimistic. “You’ve come a long, long way, Julia,†he said. “We expected this. The great thing is that you wanted to stay on track. It would be best for you to continue with our therapy sessions. We can explore whether you wish to continue drinking with naltrexone or to abstain altogether.â€
Six months later, Julia realized that her life was no longer being controlled by her drinking. “Why then should I continue to drink?†she asked herself. She came to the conclusion that drinking was not for her. She was able to attend parties without drinking. She was happy to tell people that, after her Sinclair Method treatment, she thought it best for her to avoid alcohol. “By all means, you go ahead,†she told others at a party. “Most people can handle alcohol. I can’t.â€
Julia keeps her naltrexone pills with her at all times, just in case the urge creeps up on her. Even now, after five years of complete
Richard’s Story: The Sinclair “Lite†Method—Same Great Success, Less Intensive
“Miracles don’t just happen, people make them happen.â€
—M Katsura
RICHARD’S CASE demonstrates that the Cure is successful with minimal intervention from doctors and therapists.
While I was on sabbatical in South Africa, I traveled to a lovely oasis town set among oak-lined streets in a valley surrounded by mountains. The people in South Africa are particularly friendly and hospitable, and it wasn’t long after we checked into our guesthouse that we were invited to a party given by a local family we had met at one of the town’s bars.
It was a perfect summer evening. At the party, we got around to discussing Nelson Mandela’s brilliant achievements, other beautiful places to visit, and of course the wonderful South African wines. The conversation veered to the high levels of intoxication I had ob﷓
served throughout South Africa. Alcoholism is also a problem in South Africa. At the party, I met Margaret, an attractive, friendly woman with a bold, direct gaze. As soon as she heard that I was a psychologist with an interest in addictions, she told me that her husband, Richard, was a severe alcoholic. “I didn’t know he was when I married him. I probably would never have married him if I had known,†she sighed. “I thought he simply liked his drink.â€
“Have you been married long?†I asked.
“Five years and three months,†she replied. “This is my second marriage, but his first. I already had two kids when we married. My late husband was a great father. He died quite suddenly of cancer. I decided to leave the city and move to a small country town. The school here is good, and I wanted my kids brought up in a clean and healthy environment. Then I met Richard and we fell in love. He’s been fantastic to my kids.†She clutched her necklace. “I didn’t know he was an alcoholic,†she said again.
“What do you mean by alcoholic?†I asked.
“He wakes up at 3 a.m. to start drinking again,†she replied. “It’s physically amazing. I wouldn’t have believed it unless I’d seen it for myself. He simply can’t stop. A real addiction.â€
I noticed her twelve-year-old daughter Alice nodding in agreement. “Yes, he drinks all the time,†Alice said. “It’s terrible.â€
“He’s a great guy,†Margaret said. “We all love him. He’s not like the other alcoholics I know. His personality barely changes when he drinks. He doesn’t become violent or nasty like so many others I’ve met.â€
A short while later, when Alice had gone, Margaret spoke more openly. “Richard simply drinks all day long. I’m worried about his health. Our sex life is zero. There’s nothing we can do about it. I wish there was. He’s had seizures, and I’ve had to rush him to hospital. A few years ago, he managed to stay clean for six months. He’s been to the local A.A. and for meetings in other places. But he always goes back to drinking. Our doctor is a great guy but says he can’t help.â€
At this point, I mentioned Sinclair’s work: “Thousands of alcoholics have already been successfully treated for this addiction,†I told her.
“I beg you, I implore you, please tell us if there is anything like this out here. Personally, I find it hard to believe that anything can help, but I’m ready to try anything. You see, I think Richard is dying.†Her voice dropped to a whisper. “I’m sure that if he goes on like this, he’ll die.â€
I quickly explained how the Sinclair Method works, how the patient must be medically evaluated before treatment with naltrexone. I made it clear to her that the method works only by combining the medication with drinking alcohol, and that there were dozens of published clinical studies in support of the treatment. I told her that Richard would need to keep a record of his craving, as well as a Drinking Diary. I ended by assuring her that there was every reason to be hopeful.
“Please, will you meet my husband?†she asked.
Richard was forty-five years old, yet looked much older. He had a ruddy complexion, was somewhat underweight, but otherwise looked healthy. He appeared to have a great deal of energy and was very friendly. He certainly believed he was well able to handle his drink.
“A bottle of wine is nothing for me,†he said. “Lots of guys lose their judgment after only a few drinks. I remember virtually everything that happens—except if I’ve had a blackout. I am an alcoholic. No question about it. I don’t deny it. If I try to stop, I get the shakes. Margaret says you have something that might help. I’m curious. As I’ve said a million times, I’ll try anything. I get up at 2 or 3 a.m. and start with my first drink. I hardly eat or sleep. My job is great because I run a pub so I can drink as much as I like, and I don’t have to worry about being fired.â€
Richard and I arranged to meet the next day at his pub so we could discuss his situation in private. I met with Richard, and Margaret joined us after about an hour.
Richard had been able to stay sober for periods of about three months before relapsing. “I’ve been to A.A. I’ve done my ninetyday-every-day meetings. It’s a great idea and works for some guys. But I always end up relapsing. It’s those one or two drinks. The devil gets into me and I’m on a roll again. Of course I don’t like it.†A worried look settled on his face. “I love hiking in the moun﷓
tains around here. I used to ride horses, take tourists on three-day trails. It’s been years since I last went out. I’m dying to see more wildlife. There are leopards and other amazing cats around here.†He stared moodily at his drink. “But I’m in the grip of this stuff. Then of course there’s Margaret. I love her kids as my own. I know I’m harming them, too.â€
I began with the standard explanation of how the Sinclair Method is being used to great effect in the United States, Europe, and Australia. It is well known that inspiring realistic hope is a powerful therapeutic tool. So I went through a basic explanation about the scientific basis of how the treatment works. “You have an 80 percent chance of being successful, but you have to be conscientious about keeping accurate records, as well as always taking your naltrexone before you drink,†I said. “Besides all that, the fact that you really want help will go a long way toward being successful.â€
I went on to explain that naltrexone was available in many countries, and that it was now available in South Africa as an import under the name ReViaTM. Richard was eager to give it a proper try, and I suggested I speak with his doctor about the treatment.
Richard’s physician, Dr. Gordon, was very friendly and open. He grasped the fundamentals of the Sinclair Method within minutes. He even made fun of my repeating myself about how the medication should only be taken if the patient drinks, that it should not be taken during periods when the patient is not drinking.
“It seems odd to me, but if you say the studies show it works this way, let’s go with it,†he said. He asked me to e-mail some medical publications on extinction to him and agreed to examine Richard, order blood tests, and provide a prescription.
I offered to support Richard by telephone and to see him again after about a month. In the past, he had been given diazepam (Valium) to calm his withdrawal symptoms, and his doctor was aware of this. Both Richard and his doctor knew that this treatment would require at least three to four months—perhaps even longer.
Margaret was especially supportive and involved, but was afraid of hoping too much. “If you can help us, I don’t know how I’ll ever be able to thank you,†she said repeatedly. “We’ll do exactly as you say. I only hope and pray it works.â€
I informed her that it was up to Richard to be proactive, but that her involvement would be crucial. She was the most supportive of partners. Her love for Richard was obvious.
Prior to seeing Dr. Gordon to begin treatment, Richard kept a Drinking Diary. His drinking level was clearly way over the top; he took the equivalent of more than fifteen drinks per day—that’s more than one hundred drinks per week—the equivalent of three bottles of 12.5 percent wine every day. Yet despite this, his liver tests showed relatively mild elevations. Dr. Gordon found that his blood pressure was high enough to prescribe an antihypertensive medication.
Richard started out on half the dose of naltrexone—25 mg for the first two days. He then moved onto the recommended dose of 50 mg per day and experienced slight nausea over the next few days. After a week, Richard said, “I’m doing exactly as you say. I am taking the medication an hour before I have my first drink at around 3 a.m. I’m drinking about the same amount, perhaps a few drinks less per day. I feel less nauseated, though. May I call you next week?â€
By the end of the second week, Richard reported, “I’m drinking less. In fact, on Wednesday and Thursday I didn’t drink anything.†He laughed suddenly. “No, I didn’t take my medication as you said not to take it unless I was drinking.â€
“That’s exactly how extinction works. It doesn’t happen overnight,†I replied.
However, Richard’s journey was not entirely smooth. I received a frantic call from Margaret late one night about a month into treatment, “Richard’s hands are trembling, and he’s shaking all over. What if he has another seizure?â€
“Call Dr. Gordon and explain that the symptoms may be related to his detoxification,†I said. “You see, he is gradually detoxifying. Even though he’s down to almost half his usual number of drinks, because of the sheer amount he has been drinking, he may be experiencing some withdrawal symptoms. If he were to stop abruptly—go cold turkey—we would probably have to hospitalize him. But the Sinclair Method allows for a gradual reduction in drinking.â€
Dr. Gordon concluded that the symptoms were related to withdrawal, and said that he could offer medication for that but would prefer not to. Richard was slowly going through withdrawal. Because his drinking levels had been so high, it was both normal and expected that he would experience some withdrawal symptoms as he began reducing the amount he consumed. But because the Sinclair Method allowed for gradual withdrawal by continuing to drink while taking naltrexone, Richard’s symptoms were far less severe than if he had suddenly gone cold turkey. This is a major advantage of the Sinclair Method. By the end of the seventh week, Richard was drinking less than thirty drinks per week and had had several alcohol-free days.
“Don’t for one minute let yourself think that you are cured,†I said to him over the phone. Richard understood the idea behind selective extinction—that he should avoid hiking in the mountains while on naltrexone. Because endorphins are also released during vigorous exercise, he should not hike or ride on the same days that he takes his naltrexone. He should save his days off drinking and the medication for hiking and other positive activities.
By the end of the twelfth week, Richard was drinking well within accepted safety limits—less than twenty-four drinks per week, and no more than four drinks in a single drinking session.
“I just don’t feel like it,†he said. “I’m sleeping much better. My appetite has returned; just ask Margaret. I’m eating like a horse. I feel like I have begun a new life. The main thing is that my craving is far lower than it has ever been.â€
After five months Richard felt that alcohol was not the major feature of his life.
“I can easily serve customers in my pub without having the least desire to drink,†he said, “I thought I might be less funny and entertaining, but that has not been a problem. The kids are pleased, and so is my fantastic Margaret.â€
At seven months, Richard was hardly drinking at all. Yet he felt he was the kind of person who might occasionally want to have a drink in the future. “Yes, I know what you are going to say—never, ever, take another drink without first taking my medication.â€
When I next saw him about a year later, Richard showed me a gold cylindrical pendant made by a local jeweler. He wore it around his neck. He opened the cylinder to expose two naltrexone tablets. He laughed. “I know what you are going to say next.â€
“What’s that?†I said.
“Never leave home without it,†he replied.
One of the main points about Richard’s case is that his treatment was successful with a limited number of one-to-one sessions. Richard also did not receive any conventional psychotherapy. At that time, the results of Project COMBINE, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in May 2006, had not yet been published. It confirmed that patients could be treated with naltrexone in primary care settings without intensive psychotherapy. Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that this “lite†version is not always suitable for patients who have psychological problems in addition to alcoholism. Such patients may require additional psychotherapeutic support. Yet if Richard had not tried this way, he would most certainly have been left untreated in his idyllic country town. He would still be struggling with his drinking. He would still be reflexively waking up at 3 a.m. for a drink, his family would still be unhappy, and his health would still be deteriorating. Instead, he is healthy and enjoying the countryside on long hikes.
About the Author
Roy D. Eskapa, Ph.D., obtained a B.A. (Psychology Major) from Reed College in
Oregon and went on to complete a Ph.D. in clinical psychology at the
California School of Professional Psychology, in Los Angeles (1983). He had
a variety of postdoctoral training experiences including forensic psychology,
multimodal therapy, and instruction in the science of addiction. He has
published several articles and book chapters as well as a four hundred-page
tome on Bizarre Sex. He developed a successful product for treating
childhood enuresis and approximately 15,000 patients were helped by it. He
also obtained a New Jersey license to practice psychotherapy and treated a
broad spectrum of patients. He is an Associate Fellow of the British
Psychological Society, and is a Chartered psychologist in Great Britain. At
present he is writing a book on Dr. David Sinclair ’s pioneering approach to the
treatment of addictions - especially alcohol.
If you could make one simple change in your diet to help you lose weight, melt fat, sleep better, and improve your memory, would you do it?
What if that same simple dietary change could also:
Reverse diabetes?
Increase your energy?
Conquer depression?
Save your eyesight?
Restore mental alertness?
Increase your lifespan?
Now, this may sound too good to be true.
But it’s not.
And you don’t have to take drugs. Nor do you have to try some newfangled experimental supplements. Or stop eating. Or even give up the foods you love.
It’s as simple as reducing the amount of sugar you eat.
This is not a trick.
You can actually give up sugar and keep your sweet tooth happy.
This is the greatest health secret of all time. And I’m going to teach you how to incorporate it into your life so you can lose weight without taking drugs. But, before I tell you how, I want you to know…
Why You Should Give Up Sugar.
Have you ever been plagued by hard-to-diagnose health problems like why you can’t lose weight, no matter how hard you exercise or diet?
Well, it’s not all in your head. It could be your sugar addiction. In fact a recent study proves that sweets are more addictive than cocaine.
Today, the average consumption of sugar is a whopping 160 pounds! It’s suicide in slow motion. Sugar addicts eliminate 11-20 years from their lifespan.
Now I’m not saying to forget your sweet tooth completely.
We all have the need to get a sweet fix. It’s part of our biological makeup. Men suck down sodas to make it through the “afternoon blues.”
The irony is that your body doesn’t actually need any sugar. Over time, “sweetener addiction” leads to a host of dreaded diseases like insulin resistance, heart disease, diabetes, and cancer. To avoid the sabotage, you must understand how to get your sweet fix without becoming addicted.
How to Reduce your Sugar Levels, Lose Weight & Reverse the Effects of Diabetes
1. Understand how much sugar you are putting into their body.
Most people are simply giving into an addiction while slowly ruining their health. To judge whether or not you are at risk, read your food labels for one day and count how many grams of sugar you are eating. Multiply your answer by 365. Then simply divide by 453.9. This will tell you how many pounds of sugar you are stuffing into your mouth annually!
2. Don’t replace table sugar with the artificial sweetener Splenda to get your sweet fix.
Splenda is a perfect example of a drug in disguise. It contains the drug sucralose. Invented in a pesticide lab, this chemical is 600 times sweeter than sugar. To make sucralose, chlorine is used. And, chlorine has a split personality.
It can be harmless or it can be life threatening. In combo with sodium, chlorine forms a harmless ionic bond to yield table salt. When used with carbon, the chlorine atom in sucralose forms a covalent bond. The end result is deadly organochlorine, known simply as a “Really Nasty Form of Chlorine.”
Unlike ionic bonds, covalently bound chlorines are a big no-no for the human body. They yield insecticides, pesticides, and herbicides. This is not something you want in your sports drink or your child’s lunchbox.
3. Avoid Equal and Nutrasweet.
Teaching organic chemistry, I taught my students how to identify the active ingredients in soda using a technique known as TLC (Thin Layer Chromatography). They discovered that the byproducts of sodas containing aspartame are all known poisons that will slowly kill you: methanol, phenylalanine, and aspartic acid. I never saw my students with a diet soda after that. Guess what Equal and Nutrasweet contains.
4. Use Natural Sweeteners as Safe Alternatives to Artificial Sweeteners.
Alternatives like erythritol, agave, xylitol and luo han guo can be found in abundance. Choosing which natural sweetener to use depends on which one tastes best to you.
How to Choose Which Natural Sweetener to Use
Agave nectar usually wins. It stimulates taste buds exactly the same way sucrose does. But unlike common table sugar, very little of its active ingredient - insulin - is absorbed. Therefore, you are protected from the dangers of sugar addiction.
Agave is a bit harder to bake with. This is where the safe and natural erythritol wins. You can replace it gram for gram with sugar. Even better, I like to use 25% table sugar and 75% erythritol in baking and ice cream. You won’t even notice the healthy difference. That’s the real magic here!
Getting Your Sweet Fix Doesn’t Have to be Deadly.
All natural sweeteners are known to help control appetite, keep insulin and blood sugar low, and prevent the formation of age accelerating molecules in our body. None of them are addicting. Nor will they diminish your lifespan. They are perfect to use with my Hormone Intelligence Therapy (HIT) program for reversing diabetes, losing fat and feeling great in 90 days.
If you learn to gauge your sugar intake with The People’s Chemist Death by Sugar Calculator and start using natural sweeteners, you will lose weight guaranteed. You won’t be plagued by hard-to-diagnose health problems. And you’ll have more years to enjoy life and those you love.
About the Author
Creator of the Hormone Intelligence Therapy (HIT) program Shane Ellison exposes how men and women can reverse diabetes, lose fat and build sexy, lean muscle that will have the opposite sex looking at you more desirably, guaranteed. Get access to Shane’s free articles at: http://www.thepeopleschemist.com/articles & discover how to cheat metabolism, lose weight and master your best physique in 90 days without taking harmful drugs or supplements.
|
|
Recent Comments